不可以,这里只能添加名词形式的crowd。中文意思是允许人们避免拥挤的人群。avoid是及物动词,后面要带名词,而crowding的词性是形容词。拓展资料

2017高考英语卷二(2017高考英语卷二答案)

避免;防止

a book on how to avoid a heart attack 一本关于如何预防心脏病发作的书

emergency action to avoid a disaster 旨在避免灾难的紧急行动

to avoid doing sth 避免做某事

Drink lots of water to avoid becoming dehydrated. 大量饮水以免脱水。

2. 避免;戒绝

They should avoid alcohol. 他们不应喝酒。

to avoid the subject of sth 避开某个话题

All through lunch he had carefully avoided the subject of the house.整个午饭期间,他一直在小心翼翼地回避房子的话题。to avoid doing sth 避免做某事

Try to avoid breathing in the fumes. 要尽量避免吸入烟雾。

Avoid going out on your own at night. 避免夜间独自出门。

3.逃避

He fled to Costa Rica to avoid doing military service. 为了避免服兵役,他逃到了哥斯达黎加。

4.躲开;避开

She swerved to avoid an oncoming car. 她突然转向以避开迎面开来的汽车。

The driver had ample time to brake or swerve and avoid the woman.

司机有足够的时间刹车或急转弯,来避开那个女人。

5.躲避;逃避

She thought he was trying to avoid her. 她觉得他在尽量避开她。

2017高考英语卷二答案

Hollywood’s theory that machines with evil minds will drive armies of killer robots is just silly. The real problem relates to the possibility that artificial intelligence(AI) may become extremely good at achieving something other than what we really want. In 1960 a well-known mathematician NorbertWiener, who founded the field of cybernetics, put it this way: “If we use, to achieve our purposes, a mechanical agency with whose operation we can not effectively interfere, we had better be quite sure that the purpose which we really desire.”好莱坞的理论认为有着邪恶头脑的机器会成为杀手机器人大军,这太愚蠢了。这一可能性的真正问题在于,AI(人工智能)可能会变得非常擅长于实现某些东西,不仅是我们真正想要的。1960年,著名数学家诺伯特维纳创立了控制论领域, 提到:“如果我们为了达到我们的目的而使用一种我们无法有效干预其运作的机械装置,我们最好确定我们真正想要的目的。”A machine with a specific purpose has another quality, one that we usually associate with living things: a wish to preserve its own existence. For the machine, this quality is not in-born, nor is it something introduced by humans; it is a logical consequence of the simple fact that the machine can not achieve its original purpose if it is dead. So if we send out a robot with the single instruction of fetching coffee, it will have a strong desire to secure success by disabling its own off switch or even killing anyone who might interfere with its task. If we are not careful, then, we could face a kind of global chess match against very determined, super intelligent machines whose objectives conflict with our own, with the real world as the chess board.有特定目的的机器还有另一种特性,我们通常把它与生物联系在一起:希望保留自己的存在。对于机器来说,这种特性不是天生的,也不是由人类引入的;如果机器死了,就无法达到其原始目的,这就是这一简单事实的逻辑化结果。如果我们给机器人发送一条取咖啡的简单指令,它就会有强烈的愿望,禁止关闭自己的开关,甚至杀死任何可能干扰其任务的人,来确保成功。如果我们不小心,我们可能会面临一场全球象棋比赛,棋盘就是现实世界,对手是异常坚定,其目标与我们的目标冲突的超级智能机器。The possibility of entering into and losing such a match should concentrating the minds of computer scientists. Some researchers argue that we can seal the machines inside a kind of firewall, using them to answer difficult questions but never allowing them to affect the real world. Unfortunately, that plan seems unlikely to work: we have yet to invent a firewall that is secure against ordinary humans, let alone super intelligent machines.参加并输掉这样一场比赛的可能性应该会引起计算机科学家的注意。一些研究人员认为,我们可以将这些机器密封在一种防火墙内,用它们解决困难的问题,但决不允许它们影响现实世界。不幸的是,这一计划似乎不太可能实现:我们还没有发明一种防火墙来保护普通人,更不用说超级智能机器了。Solving the safety problem well enough to move forward in AI seems to be possible but not easy. There are probably decades in which to plan for the arrival of super intelligent machines. But the problem should not be dismissed out of hand, as it has been by some AI researchers. Some argue that humans and machines can coexist as long as they work in teams—yet that is not possible unless machines share the goals of humans. Others say we can just “switch them off” as if super intelligent machines are too stupid to think of that possibility. Still others think that super intelligent AI will never happen. On September11, 1933, famous physicist Ernest Rutherford stated, with confidence, “Anyone who expects a source of power in the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.” However, on September 12, 1933, physicist Leo Szilard invented the neutron-induced nuclear chain reaction.很好地解决安全问题以推动AI的发展似乎是可能的,但并不容易。几十年内为超级智能机器的到来做好计划是可能的,但这个问题不应该像一些AI研究人员所做的那样,随意被忽视。有些人认为,人和机器可以共存,只要他们在团队中工作,但这是不可能的,除非机器与人类的目标相同。也有人说我们可以“关掉它们”,好像超级智能机器很蠢,不会想到这种可能性。还有人认为超级智能AI永远不会发生。1933年9月11日,著名物理学家欧内斯特·卢瑟福满怀信心地说,“任何期望这些原子转化过程成为能量来源的人都在胡说八道。”1933年9月12日,物理学家利奥·西拉德发明了中子诱导链式核反应。

2017二卷高考数学

LZ您好

全国卷2本来就不是难卷,且2017年的全国卷2的难度"歪了"

歪的地方是题目不算新,计算量挺大(第18题概率论与数理统计的大题,并且位置靠前,后面大题不难但是做完这题心态容易崩)

所以有一定计算量训练的学生这张卷应该很轻松

基础选择填空完全在比简单题用时...可能拉分的题:选择题最后一题建立坐标系进行向量计算,立刻天就蓝了...结果还是考计算量!

填空倒数第二题是裂项填空最后一题画完图结果还是变成计算题...

三角大题是基础.圆锥曲线和立体几何大题也是思路送分,看你认不认真计算.压轴导数题算不得难但是(1)须有极限思想;(2)是分类讨论,存在唯一极大值点被你证明好了这题也结束了.

坐标系与参数方程选修题有积化和差的技巧...不等式的那个选修题也是套路,但是是证明题,所以难度比坐标系题要难...

所以这张卷子,真心难度不大,问做题认真不认真,计算量稍微偏大而已.